Pyne in the Wild

The Proof Ladder

Every script in the corpus climbs the same four rungs. No cherry-picking — failures are published right next to the successes.

T0

Compiles

PyneComp converts the original Pine source into runnable Python, untouched by human hands.

554 / 554 scripts

T1

Runs

PyneCore executes the converted script over 25,000+ bars of real exchange data without errors.

554 / 554 compiled

T2

Has measurable output

The run emitted numeric plot or trade data that can be checked. Drawing-only scripts are reported separately.

533 / 554 with plot/trade output

T3

Matches TradingView

Plot and trade outputs are compared bar by bar and trade by trade against TradingView's own reference.

754 / 754 outputs

490 plot + 264 trade outputs

Results at a Glance

Indicators compared plot by plot, strategies trade by trade, against TradingView's own output. The headline counts are over the scripts that produce a comparable numeric reference; a plot PyneCore fails to reproduce counts as a divergence, never as "no reference". Corpus coverage and each script's full detail are in The Corpus below.

Corpus outcome

521Matches TradingView
0Diverges from TradingView
11Depends on lookahead
1Data-limited (unavailable feed)
21Runs (no reference output)
0Run failed

Indicators — plot verification

255 / 255

indicators clearing the ≥99% plot-match threshold

Comparable plot references255 / 277
Compared plots >=99%255 / 255
Exact plot matches255 / 255
Mean on compared plots100%
Worst per-script plot match100%

Strategies — trade timing

266 / 264

strategies clearing the ≥99% entry and exit timing threshold

Trade references available264 / 277
Entry+exit timing >=99%266 / 264
Fully verified strategy outputs266 / 277
Trades compared in total215,718
Exact trade-count matches266 / 264
Net profit within tolerance264 / 264
Mean entry/exit timing match100% / 100%

How closely — the numbers themselves

99.672%

of the compared plotted values were the identical IEEE-754 double

Plotted values compared68,337,728
Identical to the bit68,114,067 (99.672%)
Scripts bit-exact throughout471 / 490
Explained by libm last bits3 / 490
Rest, within the published band16 / 490
Worst relative gap from TradingView1.2 × 10⁻¹⁰ (~9 sig. figures)

Methodology

Reproducible by design. The manifest pins the exact source of every script with a SHA-256 hash — and TradingView keeps every published version forever, so anyone can re-run the comparison.

run parameters

symbol      = BINANCE:BTCUSDTtimeframe   = 30 minexceptions  = 24 scripts on their own marketbars        = 25,000+ per scriptulp_limit   = 64 (libm tier)rel_tol     = 1e-9scale_floor = 1e-9 x series mediannet_tol     = 2.0% of the larger netreference   = TradingView exportsources     = SHA-256 pinned manifest

1

Open-source scripts only

A script enters the corpus only if it is published open source, written in a supported Pine version, and its header does not forbid reuse. The detected license is recorded in the manifest.

2

No source redistribution

Only the manifest (name, author, link, license, version, SHA-256) is published. Pine sources are fetched locally, used for measurement, never re-hosted.

3

TradingView is the reference

Reference plots and trade lists come from running the original script on TradingView itself, on the same symbol, timeframe and bar range.

4

Failures stay on the board

Scripts that time out or hit harness limits are reported as-is. A proof you can't falsify is not a proof.

“Matches” is a weak word. Here is what it means.

A percentage only says the outputs landed inside a band, and a band is something we chose. So each compared value is also placed on the one scale that is not ours to choose — the IEEE-754 double both engines store it in. Consecutive representable doubles are one step apart; that step is the finest distinction the type can make.

bit-exact Every compared bar produced the identical double. Not “close enough”: the same 64 bits, from the first bar to the last.
libm The values differ only in the last bits of the mantissa, and the script reaches a transcendental function — log, exp, pow, the trig family. IEEE-754 requires + − × ÷ and sqrt to be correctly rounded, and requires nothing of those, so CPython's C library and TradingView's Java runtime can both be right and still land a few representable values apart — which a long accumulation then carries forward. The tier is capped at 64 representable values, chosen from measurement: across our own reference corpus the widest such gap is 23. A script whose numbers sit inside that cap but reaches no transcendental is not labelled this way; an explanation has to explain something.

The two tiers sit under the Verified badge in the table, because that is what they are: the rung a verified script reached, never a verdict of their own. Anything else carries no tier line — it agreed within the published band, which is what the Verified badge above already says. The band itself is one number, not two — a relative tolerance. Near zero a relative test has nothing to be relative to, so it falls back on a floor taken from the series' own median magnitude; a fixed absolute floor would be unreachable for a series living at 100,000 and larger than the whole signal for one living at 0.000001.

The band itself, script by script

Agreement “within the band” is a range, not a verdict, so here is the whole tier — worst relative gap first. The worst case is one number; the shape underneath it — a single outlier over a floor of near-exact agreement — is what a bare worst-case or a mean would throw away.

script	max_rel	sig. figures
Machine Learning Moving Average [LuxAlgo]	1.2 × 10⁻¹⁰	~9
Easy System 420	1.0 × 10⁻¹¹	~10
EMA Slope - RSI Oscillator Strategy	7.5 × 10⁻¹²	~11
OBV MACD Indicator	5.2 × 10⁻¹²	~11
TSI CCI Hull with profit$$$	2.8 × 10⁻¹²	~11
the other 11 scripts	< 10⁻¹²	12+

Don't take our word for it. Every script is pinned by SHA-256, and TradingView keeps every published version. Pull the same script, run it on your own TradingView subscription, and compare it with PyneSys. The numbers are the numbers.

The Corpus

The most-liked open-source Pine scripts on TradingView, in order of community popularity (or whatever you sort the table by — the choice is remembered). Every name links to the original publication.


RSI Divergence Strategyby Pro_Trader_HTBB 618	STRv6	Verifiedbit-exact	100%3 plots	100%10 / 10	✓100.000%	27,618
Plot match vs TradingView100% Accuracy Trades compared10 TV / 10 Pyne Whole-trade match100% Entry timing match100% Exit timing match100% Net profit (TV / Pyne)1,055 / 1,055 Plots compared3 Plotted values compared27,977 Identical to the bit100% Worst gapsame double Pearson correlation (min)1.000000 Worst-matching plotRSI Run Bars executed27,618 Run time2.63 s CPU Per-bar time0.10 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar) Data window SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT Timeframe30 min From2025-01-01 00:00 To2026-07-30 08:30 Bars27,618 Source Pine versionv6 Script revisionv1 Licenseunspecified SHA-256`c08ac6dfb38492df26eb652379a4b813b48c478a167c92db72bd69f90c2c867d` View on TradingView
Precision Confluence Trading Strategy [JOAT]by officialjackofalltrades · MPL-2.0 602	STRv6	Verifiedbit-exact	100%14 plots	100%358 / 358	✓100.000%	27,618
Plot match vs TradingView100% Accuracy Trades compared358 TV / 358 Pyne Whole-trade match100% Entry timing match100% Exit timing match100% Net profit (TV / Pyne)-869 / -869 Plots compared14 Plotted values compared330,998 Identical to the bit100% Worst gapsame double Pearson correlation (min)1.000000 Worst-matching plotDaily Pivot Run Bars executed27,618 Secondary-feed bars43,071 Total bars processed70,689 Run time207.18 s CPU Per-bar time7.50 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar) Data window SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT Timeframe30 min From2025-01-01 00:00 To2026-07-30 08:30 Bars27,618 Security @ D min2,038 bars Security @ W min293 bars Security @ 15 min40,740 bars Source Pine versionv6 Script revisionv1 LicenseMPL-2.0 SHA-256`a4780b85c234865b316a010f3c57398283f786517d52f32c60dacf21ef5be41f` View on TradingView
Elite Strategy by denismwabu1 · MPL-2.0 601	STRv6	Verifiedbit-exact	100%2 plots	100%518 / 518	✓100.000%	28,307
Plot match vs TradingView100% Accuracy Trades compared518 TV / 518 Pyne Whole-trade match100% Entry timing match100% Exit timing match100% Net profit (TV / Pyne)182 / 182 Plots compared2 Plotted values compared56,614 Identical to the bit100% Worst gapsame double Pearson correlation (min)1.000000 Worst-matching plotBuy Arrow Run Bars executed28,307 Secondary-feed bars245,334 Total bars processed273,641 Run time42.13 s CPU Per-bar time1.49 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar) Data window SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT Timeframe30 min From2025-01-01 00:00 To2026-08-13 17:00 Bars28,307 Security @ 1 min99,944 bars Security @ 5 min99,988 bars Security @ 15 min42,118 bars Security @ D min3,284 bars Source Pine versionv6 Script revisionv1 LicenseMPL-2.0 SHA-256`8d87209fc624ad1b27398e5143ffd64818224c30611e6fe39dec890fb0d41b3b` View on TradingView
Fabio Valentini Pro Scalper [PickMyTrade]by PickMyTrade_Official 600	STRv6	Verifiedbit-exact	100%16 plots	100%1,183 / 1,183	✓100.000%	27,619
Plot match vs TradingView100% Accuracy Trades compared1,183 TV / 1,183 Pyne Whole-trade match100% Entry timing match100% Exit timing match100% Net profit (TV / Pyne)63,393 / 63,393 Plots compared16 Plotted values compared440,543 Identical to the bit100% Worst gapsame double Pearson correlation (min)1.000000 Worst-matching plotVWAP Run Bars executed27,619 Run time3.87 s CPU Per-bar time0.14 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar) Data window SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT Timeframe30 min From2025-01-01 00:00 To2026-07-30 09:00 Bars27,619 Source Pine versionv6 Script revisionv2 Licenseunspecified SHA-256`51c4a19753f419803e74604b4b9bbb877e733839d1cb5346fc12a41a8845758c` View on TradingView

Every script on this page was compiled by PyneComp and run by PyneCore. Both are live.

Try PyneComp Convert your first Pine script at pynesys.io

The Proof Ladder

Compiles

Runs

Has measurable output

Matches TradingView

Results at a Glance

Corpus outcome

Indicators — plot verification

Strategies — trade timing

How closely — the numbers themselves

Methodology

Open-source scripts only

No source redistribution

TradingView is the reference

Failures stay on the board

“Matches” is a weak word. Here is what it means.

The band itself, script by script

The Corpus

Accuracy

Run

Data window

Source

Accuracy

Run

Data window

Source

Accuracy

Run

Data window

Source

Accuracy

Run

Data window

Source