Pine-to-Python verification report

Pyne in the Wild

Real TradingView Pine scripts, run as Python.

PyneComp converts open-source Pine Script™ into Python. PyneCore runs the converted scripts on real market data, and this report compares plots and trades against TradingView's own output.

PyneCore is validated against TradingView on 1,000 published Pine scripts; last run . How it is measured

  1. Pine Script
  2. PyneComp
  3. PyneCore (Python)
  4. TradingView reference
1,000 published scripts open-source Pine Script corpus
1,353 TV-comparable outputs 885 plot + 468 trade outputs
100% TV fidelity 1353/1353 comparable outputs verified
99.771% bit-exact values All remaining values matched within published tolerance

The Proof Ladder

Every script in the corpus climbs the same four rungs. No cherry-picking — failures are published right next to the successes.

T0

Compiles

PyneComp converts the original Pine source into runnable Python, untouched by human hands.

1000 / 1000 scripts
T1

Runs

PyneCore executes the converted script over 25,000+ bars of real exchange data without errors.

1000 / 1000 compiled
T2

Has measurable output

The run emitted numeric plot or trade data that can be checked. Drawing-only scripts are reported separately.

972 / 1000 with plot/trade output
T3

Matches TradingView

Plot and trade outputs are compared bar by bar and trade by trade against TradingView's own reference.

1353 / 1353 outputs
885 plot + 468 trade outputs

Results at a Glance

Indicators compared plot by plot, strategies trade by trade, against TradingView's own output. The headline counts are over the scripts that produce a comparable numeric reference; a plot PyneCore fails to reproduce counts as a divergence, never as "no reference". Corpus coverage and each script's full detail are in The Corpus below.

Corpus outcome

1000 scripts
  • 945Matches TradingView
  • 0Diverges from TradingView
  • 26Depends on lookahead
  • 1Data-limited (unavailable feed)
  • 28Runs (no reference output)
  • 0Run failed

Indicators — plot verification

474 / 474

indicators clearing the ≥99% plot-match threshold

  • Comparable plot references474 / 502
  • Compared plots >=99%474 / 474
  • Exact plot matches474 / 474
  • Mean on compared plots100%
  • Worst per-script plot match100%

Strategies — trade timing

468 / 468

trade-producing strategies clearing the ≥99% whole-trade timing threshold

  • Trade-producing strategies compared468 / 498
  • Whole-trade timing >=99%468 / 468
  • Plot-verified, no trades produced3
  • Verified strategies (trades or plots)471 / 498
  • TradingView trades checked353,577
  • Exact trade-count matches468 / 468
  • Net profit within tolerance468 / 468
  • Mean entry/exit timing match100% / 100%

How closely — the numbers themselves

99.771%

of the compared plotted values were the identical IEEE-754 double

  • Plotted values compared131,744,275
  • Identical to the bit131,442,893 (99.771%)
  • Scripts bit-exact throughout866 / 884
  • Explained by libm last bits3 / 884
  • Rest, within the published band15 / 884
  • Worst relative gap from TradingView6.3 × 10⁻¹² (~11 sig. figures)

Methodology

Reproducible by design. The manifest pins the exact source of every script with a SHA-256 hash — and TradingView keeps every published version forever, so anyone can re-run the comparison.

run parameters 
symbol      = BINANCE:BTCUSDTtimeframe   = 30 minexceptions  = 48 scripts on their own marketbars        = 25,000+ per scriptulp_limit   = 64 (libm tier)rel_tol     = 1e-9scale_floor = 1e-9 x series mediannet_tol     = 2.0% of the larger netreference   = TradingView exportsources     = SHA-256 pinned manifest
1

Open-source scripts only

A script enters the corpus only if it is published open source, written in a supported Pine version, and its header does not forbid reuse. The detected license is recorded in the manifest.

2

No source redistribution

Only the manifest (name, author, link, license, version, SHA-256) is published. Pine sources are fetched locally, used for measurement, never re-hosted.

3

TradingView is the reference

Reference plots and trade lists come from running the original script on TradingView itself, on the same symbol, timeframe and bar range.

4

Failures stay on the board

Scripts that time out or hit harness limits are reported as-is. A proof you can't falsify is not a proof.

“Matches” is a weak word. Here is what it means.

A percentage only says the outputs landed inside a band, and a band is something we chose. So each compared value is also placed on the one scale that is not ours to choose — the IEEE-754 double both engines store it in. Consecutive representable doubles are one step apart; that step is the finest distinction the type can make.

  • bit-exact Every compared bar produced the identical double. Not “close enough”: the same 64 bits, from the first bar to the last.
  • libm The values differ only in the last bits of the mantissa, and the script reaches a transcendental function — log, exp, pow, the trig family. IEEE-754 requires + − × ÷ and sqrt to be correctly rounded, and requires nothing of those, so CPython's C library and TradingView's Java runtime can both be right and still land a few representable values apart — which a long accumulation then carries forward. The tier is capped at 64 representable values, chosen from measurement: across our own reference corpus the widest such gap is 23. A script whose numbers sit inside that cap but reaches no transcendental is not labelled this way; an explanation has to explain something.

The two tiers sit under the Verified badge in the table, because that is what they are: the rung a verified script reached, never a verdict of their own. Anything else carries no tier line — it agreed within the published band, which is what the Verified badge above already says. The band itself is one number, not two — a relative tolerance. Near zero a relative test has nothing to be relative to, so it falls back on a floor taken from the series' own median magnitude; a fixed absolute floor would be unreachable for a series living at 100,000 and larger than the whole signal for one living at 0.000001.

The band itself, script by script

Agreement “within the band” is a range, not a verdict, so here is the whole tier — worst relative gap first. The worst case is one number; the shape underneath it — a single outlier over a floor of near-exact agreement — is what a bare worst-case or a mean would throw away.

scriptmax_relsig. figures
Machine Learning Moving Average [LuxAlgo]6.3 × 10⁻¹²~11
TSI CCI Hull with profit$$$2.8 × 10⁻¹²~11
Reaction Path [BullByte]9.0 × 10⁻¹³~12
the other 12 scripts< 10⁻¹²12+

Don't take our word for it. Every script is pinned by SHA-256, and TradingView keeps every published version. Pull the same script, run it on your own TradingView subscription, and compare it with PyneSys. The numbers are the numbers.

The Corpus

The most-liked open-source Pine scripts on TradingView, in order of community popularity (or whatever you sort the table by — the choice is remembered). Every name links to the original publication.

Stochastic Optimized Trend Tracker *Strategy*by lucidreamer15 · MPL-2.0 1,472STRv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%5 plots
100%206 / 206
✓100.000%28,938
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared206 TV / 206 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-7,947 / -7,947
  • Plots compared5
  • Plotted values compared57,876
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,938
  • Run time3.07 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.11 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-26 20:30
  • Bars28,938

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-256c57994dbc9f5ab662732ee191c47913b1bdf75be409a5deb20278aa243825e45

View on TradingView Permalink: Stochastic Optimized Trend Tracker *Strategy*
BEST Supertrend Strategyby Daveatt 1,469STRv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%5 plots
100%891 / 891
✓100.000%28,938
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared891 TV / 891 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-29,489,264 / -29,489,264
  • Plots compared5
  • Plotted values compared144,627
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,938
  • Secondary-feed bars3,917
  • Total bars processed32,855
  • Run time5.01 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.17 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-26 20:30
  • Bars28,938
  • Security @ 1D3,297 bars
  • Security @ 1W466 bars
  • Security @ 1M107 bars
  • Security @ 3M37 bars
  • Security @ 12M10 bars

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-2565663e7b673c0db194b62da9150353934417353d7d1096d45455e439a932747b4

View on TradingView Permalink: BEST Supertrend Strategy
Qullamaggie Breakout V2by millerrh · MPL-2.0 1,468STRv5Lookahead
11.14%10 plots
86.02%225 / 235
✗90.896%28,939
Plot match vs TradingView11.1%

Lookahead, measured — run once with PyneCore's own rules and once with TradingView's future-leaks restored (an open higher-timeframe period read as if it had closed, or a body re-running mid-bar handed the completed bar), the script's own plots differ. Its results depend on data its bars could not have had, so its TradingView reference is itself a lookahead result. With the future-leaks restored on the PyneCore side too, its plots match TradingView 97.2%. Held apart from the accuracy score.

Accuracy

  • Trades compared225 TV / 235 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match86.02%
  • Entry timing match93.81%
  • Exit timing match91.11%
  • Extra Pyne entries24
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-35,835 / -32,572
  • Plots compared10
  • Plotted values compared98,737
  • Identical to the bit11.474%
  • Worst gap9.6 × 10⁻² relative (~1 significant figures)
  • Bars plotted by one side only2,978
  • Match on values alone11.474%
  • Pearson correlation (min)0.994646
  • Worst-matching plotMA1

Run

  • Bars executed28,939
  • Secondary-feed bars3,297
  • Total bars processed32,236
  • Run time7.60 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.26 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-26 21:00
  • Bars28,939
  • Security @ 1D3,297 bars

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv3
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-256612ff70ed7dc13b9bd555a4347c10715599d5e75663201d929cdc6582d5cc8f7

View on TradingView Permalink: Qullamaggie Breakout V2
Elder Ray (Bull Power) TP and SLby HPotter 1,467STRv5Verified
—
100%27 / 27
✓100.000%28,938

Accuracy

  • Trades compared27 TV / 27 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-11,008 / -11,008

Run

  • Bars executed28,938
  • Run time0.77 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.03 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-26 20:30
  • Bars28,938

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-256fea127193b04b47ea58f2a84fcf91ec69c30121787d35f22cef3d6d108974651

View on TradingView Permalink: Elder Ray (Bull Power) TP and SL
Turtle Strategy - Triple EMA Trend with ADX and ATRby cyatophilum · MPL-2.0 1,462STRv6Verifiedbit-exact
100%8 plots
100%108 / 108
✓100.000%30,687
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared108 TV / 108 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-106 / -106
  • Plots compared8
  • Plotted values compared195,810
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed30,687
  • Run time1.11 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.04 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-10-02 07:00
  • Bars30,687

Source

  • Pine versionv6
  • Script revisionv2
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-256655c5d5d91e2a44dfa58bd55d20987239b4e5f5b6794742b2b1ae726eff7a8a1

View on TradingView Permalink: Turtle Strategy - Triple EMA Trend with ADX and ATR
RSI Divergence Strategyby faytterro · MPL-2.0 1,453STRv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%1 plot
100%1,355 / 1,355
✓100.000%28,954
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared1,355 TV / 1,355 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)2,340,220 / 2,340,220
  • Plots compared1
  • Plotted values compared28,939
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,954
  • Run time4.53 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.16 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 04:30
  • Bars28,954

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-2560bed540a4b347ffa0d040e511a769972adb7f338bcbfecfdaf22cd9c7fcbadbe

View on TradingView Permalink: RSI Divergence Strategy
BTC 15 minby RafaelZioni · MPL-2.0 1,448STRv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%3 plots
100%118 / 118
✓100.000%28,953
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared118 TV / 118 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)2,328 / 2,328
  • Plots compared3
  • Plotted values compared86,772
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Transcendentals on the pathpow
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,953
  • Secondary-feed bars99,944
  • Total bars processed128,897
  • Run time4.08 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.14 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 04:00
  • Bars28,953
  • Security @ 1 min99,944 bars

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-25653011c488abb40b2f0482332fa9275d66dce67cb24fb158660b664a2538a25fd

View on TradingView Permalink: BTC 15 min
SUPPORT RESISTANCE STRATEGY [5MIN TF]by The_Algo_Engineer 1,446STRv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%4 plots
100%109 / 109
✓100.000%28,953
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared109 TV / 109 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-915,276 / -915,276
  • Plots compared4
  • Plotted values compared115,512
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,953
  • Run time1.99 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.07 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 04:00
  • Bars28,953

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-256c28fab065944ddedeb5f6a089f09839f8bccd1b1ab52108662e3d13b909c6ca2

View on TradingView Permalink: SUPPORT RESISTANCE STRATEGY [5MIN TF]
Strategy Death To The Bear by Dreadblitz 1,442STRv4Lookahead
94.35%15 plots
95.99%324 / 324
✓101.943%28,954
Plot match vs TradingView94.3%

Lookahead, measured — run once with PyneCore's own rules and once with TradingView's future-leaks restored (an open higher-timeframe period read as if it had closed, or a body re-running mid-bar handed the completed bar), the script's own plots differ. Its results depend on data its bars could not have had, so its TradingView reference is itself a lookahead result. With the future-leaks restored on the PyneCore side too, its plots match TradingView 94.35%. Held apart from the accuracy score.

Accuracy

  • Trades compared324 TV / 324 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match95.99%
  • Entry timing match98.15%
  • Exit timing match96.6%
  • Extra Pyne entries6
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)203,862 / 207,823
  • Plots compared15
  • Plotted values compared368,960
  • Identical to the bit94.353%
  • Worst gap7.1 × 10⁻³ relative (~2 significant figures)
  • Bars plotted by one side only25
  • Match on values alone94.353%
  • Pearson correlation (min)0.999988
  • Worst-matching plotTP-1

Run

  • Bars executed28,954
  • Secondary-feed bars3,298
  • Total bars processed32,252
  • Run time5.20 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.18 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 04:30
  • Bars28,954
  • Security @ 1D3,298 bars

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-25623830eb4e70a062c61d05103e3a0e9b4a42a65f498b28c814a52a6cff3ba33ad

View on TradingView Permalink: Strategy Death To The Bear
RSI Strategy [PrimeAutomation]by ChartPrime · MPL-2.0 1,442STRv6Verifiedbit-exact
100%7 plots
100%217 / 217
✓100.000%27,613
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared217 TV / 217 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-205 / -205
  • Plots compared7
  • Plotted values compared135,159
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed27,613
  • Secondary-feed bars99,989
  • Total bars processed127,602
  • Run time9.72 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.35 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-07-30 06:00
  • Bars27,613
  • Security @ 5 min99,989 bars

Source

  • Pine versionv6
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-256f6c445c832bef4cc64a65575dac25c7b8008c7912db5b2d5bd24bd9f6cd2c64e

View on TradingView Permalink: RSI Strategy [PrimeAutomation]
Donchian Breakout Strategyby millerrh 1,438STRv5Lookaheadbit-exact
100%6 plots
100%664 / 664
✗96.172%28,954
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Lookahead, measured — run once with PyneCore's own rules and once with TradingView's future-leaks restored (an open higher-timeframe period read as if it had closed, or a body re-running mid-bar handed the completed bar), the script's own trades differ. Its results depend on data its bars could not have had, so its TradingView reference is itself a lookahead result. With the future-leaks restored on the PyneCore side too, its trades match TradingView 100%. Held apart from the accuracy score.

Accuracy

  • Trades compared664 TV / 664 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-62,370 / -59,983
  • Plots compared6
  • Plotted values compared57,880
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,954
  • Secondary-feed bars3,253
  • Total bars processed32,207
  • Run time5.11 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.18 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 04:30
  • Bars28,954
  • Security @ 1D3,253 bars

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv10
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-2563621e50b9e76adf4cbd6a04113e3e64771aced0380da4c3650bf307271c940fe

View on TradingView Permalink: Donchian Breakout Strategy
CHOP Zone Entry Strategy + DMI/PSAR Exitby IronCasper · MPL-2.0 1,431STRv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%5 plots
100%266 / 266
✓100.000%28,956
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared266 TV / 266 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-17,589 / -17,589
  • Plots compared5
  • Plotted values compared29,206
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Transcendentals on the pathlog10
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,956
  • Run time2.14 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.07 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 05:30
  • Bars28,956

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv3
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-25642985c697c989f799c303531a67fb30c108eadf20a50db89e1b51586d17b433b

View on TradingView Permalink: CHOP Zone Entry Strategy + DMI/PSAR Exit
Two Take Profits and Two Stop Lossby ahmad_naquib 1,427STRv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%10 plots
100%4,388 / 4,388
✓100.000%28,956
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared4,388 TV / 4,388 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)660,275 / 660,275
  • Plots compared10
  • Plotted values compared57,884
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,956
  • Run time2.02 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.07 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 05:30
  • Bars28,956

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-2560df593a7fc4c40a1cffeccb22022ba0637547e58e52a3f086b00e97216473443

View on TradingView Permalink: Two Take Profits and Two Stop Loss
SuperTrend Backtesterby DevLucem 1,423STRv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%1 plot
100%724 / 724
✓100.000%28,966
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared724 TV / 724 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-26 / -26
  • Plots compared1
  • Plotted values compared28,960
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,966
  • Run time1.58 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.05 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 10:30
  • Bars28,966

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-25697602ee0896333ffde2c3ce3313cdb0f1b511a781c2c417168b627a39633ad80

View on TradingView Permalink: SuperTrend Backtester
Divergence IQ [TradingIQ]by Trading-IQ · MPL-2.0 1,404STRv6Verifiedbit-exact
100%28 plots
100%187 / 187
✓100.000%30,541
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared187 TV / 187 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-9 / -9
  • Plots compared28
  • Plotted values compared249,223
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed30,541
  • Secondary-feed bars99,988
  • Total bars processed130,529
  • Run time5.41 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.18 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-09-29 06:00
  • Bars30,541
  • Security @ 1 min99,988 bars

Source

  • Pine versionv6
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-25629d0716623776e807da0cbe152e01549767e119ee662d1c87fc1c4d899ba69b5

View on TradingView Permalink: Divergence IQ [TradingIQ]
Donchian Channel Strategy [for free bot]by AlgoTrading_CC · MPL-2.0 1,397STRv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%4 plots
100%2,369 / 2,369
✓100.000%28,966
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared2,369 TV / 2,369 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-133 / -133
  • Plots compared4
  • Plotted values compared115,808
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,966
  • Run time2.91 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.10 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 10:30
  • Bars28,966

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv3
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-256d2e0497c9b473ae54e793868458250ffa63f44c8cbaf63542d8f26506a7b3a04

View on TradingView Permalink: Donchian Channel Strategy [for free bot]
Super 8 - 30M BTCby AssassinsGrid · MPL-2.0 1,397STRv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%8 plots
100%371 / 371
✓100.000%28,967
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared371 TV / 371 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)4,411 / 4,411
  • Plots compared8
  • Plotted values compared188,781
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Transcendentals on the pathpow
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,967
  • Run time4.67 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.16 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 11:00
  • Bars28,967

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv5
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-256ca866cd8de768b069093eb85cf115ce662447bf4d68bcb28629a9bef4b866b92

View on TradingView Permalink: Super 8 - 30M BTC
Strategy: HMA 50 + Supertrend Sniperby Gustav_Rex 1,396STRv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%4 plots
100%1,122 / 1,122
✓100.000%28,967
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared1,122 TV / 1,122 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)2,099 / 2,099
  • Plots compared4
  • Plotted values compared115,805
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,967
  • Run time1.88 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.06 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 11:00
  • Bars28,967

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-2565a336941110db32dc6f7a85317bab19d54fd39b278102d65c300e7adbfb34e83

View on TradingView Permalink: Strategy: HMA 50 + Supertrend Sniper
Triple EMA + QQE Trend Following Strategy [TradeDots]by tradedots · MPL-2.0 1,396STRv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%3 plots
100%516 / 516
✓100.000%28,967
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared516 TV / 516 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-1,676 / -1,676
  • Plots compared3
  • Plotted values compared59,254
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,967
  • Run time1.75 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.06 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 11:00
  • Bars28,967

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-25639863f896f75e1c109aba0f86a01561047e6a3c9511dee42b89791b67b2aae84

View on TradingView Permalink: Triple EMA + QQE Trend Following Strategy [TradeDots]
Double Exponential Moving Average 8-20-63 Strategyby Noldo · MPL-2.0 1,395STRv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%3 plots
100%998 / 998
✓100.000%28,968
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared998 TV / 998 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-83,308 / -83,308
  • Plots compared3
  • Plotted values compared86,728
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,968
  • Run time1.50 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.05 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 11:30
  • Bars28,968

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-256c1c0424369f169135a693a4d7938c7c6857de37be7c05b090c6af6964a293085

View on TradingView Permalink: Double Exponential Moving Average 8-20-63 Strategy
Hull Fisherby SeaSide420 1,395STRv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%11 plots
100%2,500 / 2,500
✓100.000%28,968
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared2,500 TV / 2,500 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-99,999 / -99,999
  • Plots compared11
  • Plotted values compared241,636
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Transcendentals on the pathlog
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,968
  • Run time2.99 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.10 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 11:30
  • Bars28,968

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-256da65ab65a9e49d0d457c0d543ca2938bddadd81e03c7c9c41cbc45417aa1a6df

View on TradingView Permalink: Hull Fisher
Strategy Myth-Busting #2 - Braid Filter+ADX+EMA-Trend - [MYN]by myncrypto · MPL-2.0 1,390STRv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%1 plot
100%70 / 70
✓100.000%28,968
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared70 TV / 70 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)389 / 389
  • Plots compared1
  • Plotted values compared28,869
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Transcendentals on the pathpow
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,968
  • Run time3.24 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.11 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 11:30
  • Bars28,968

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-2568944086a06fb6db6a144bc14cd88bdbc57704bc2025d7edefaa8947db1cb09fb

View on TradingView Permalink: Strategy Myth-Busting #2 - Braid Filter+ADX+EMA-Trend - [MYN]
(IK) Grid Scriptby tapRoot_coding · MPL-2.0 1,386STRv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%17 plots
100%68 / 68
✓100.115%28,968
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared68 TV / 68 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)50 / 50
  • Plots compared17
  • Plotted values compared286,410
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed28,968
  • Run time2.79 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.10 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:DOGEUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-27 11:30
  • Bars28,968

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv4
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-2566efdb72352bad251ffb77c23a83333ced59de55c3d3f18738dd4d1cd30114d07

View on TradingView Permalink: (IK) Grid Script
Gap Filling Strategy by alexgrover · MPL-2.0 1,379STRv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%1 plot
100%906 / 906
✓100.000%21,655
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared906 TV / 906 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-77 / -77
  • Plots compared1
  • Plotted values compared21,642
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed21,655
  • Run time1.52 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.07 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolNASDAQ:AAPL
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2020-01-02 14:30
  • To2026-08-26 19:00
  • Bars21,655

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-25650023686f1f9c852d870e0a32660e8d6a03ad89cd0a89c409bfe50b566c1d70e

View on TradingView Permalink: Gap Filling Strategy
Trailing Take Profitby jason5480 · MIT 1,376STRv6Verifiedbit-exact
100%4 plots
100%3 / 3
✓100.000%27,613
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared3 TV / 3 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)20,616 / 20,616
  • Plots compared4
  • Plotted values compared109,660
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000

Run

  • Bars executed27,613
  • Run time7.81 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.28 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-07-30 06:00
  • Bars27,613

Source

  • Pine versionv6
  • Script revisionv22
  • LicenseMIT

SHA-2563d60c9d9e8b542137f5b91baffddf3c90c30c4adbd66b73bb62caad7cfe4e018

View on TradingView Permalink: Trailing Take Profit

Every script on this page was compiled by PyneComp and run by PyneCore. Both are live.

Try PyneComp Convert your first Pine script at pynesys.io