Pine-to-Python verification report

Pyne in the Wild

Real TradingView Pine scripts, run as Python.

PyneComp converts open-source Pine Script™ into Python. PyneCore runs the converted scripts on real market data, and this report compares plots and trades against TradingView's own output.

  1. Pine Script
  2. PyneComp
  3. PyneCore (Python)
  4. TradingView reference
544 published scripts open-source Pine Script corpus
743 TV-comparable outputs 484 plot + 259 trade outputs
100% TV fidelity 743/743 comparable outputs verified
99.669% bit-exact values All remaining values matched within published tolerance

The Proof Ladder

Every script in the corpus climbs the same four rungs. No cherry-picking — failures are published right next to the successes.

T0

Compiles

PyneComp converts the original Pine source into runnable Python, untouched by human hands.

544 / 544 scripts
T1

Runs

PyneCore executes the converted script over 25,000+ bars of real exchange data without errors.

544 / 544 compiled
T2

Has measurable output

The run emitted numeric plot or trade data that can be checked. Drawing-only scripts are reported separately.

524 / 544 with plot/trade output
T3

Matches TradingView

Plot and trade outputs are compared bar by bar and trade by trade against TradingView's own reference.

743 / 743 outputs
484 plot + 259 trade outputs

Results at a Glance

Indicators compared plot by plot, strategies trade by trade, against TradingView's own output. The headline counts are over the scripts that produce a comparable numeric reference; a plot PyneCore fails to reproduce counts as a divergence, never as "no reference". Corpus coverage and each script's full detail are in The Corpus below.

Corpus outcome

544 scripts
  • 512Matches TradingView
  • 0Diverges from TradingView
  • 11Depends on lookahead
  • 1Data-limited (unavailable feed)
  • 20Runs (no reference output)
  • 0Run failed

Indicators — plot verification

251 / 251

indicators clearing the ≥99% plot-match threshold

  • Comparable plot references251 / 272
  • Compared plots >=99%251 / 251
  • Exact plot matches251 / 251
  • Mean on compared plots100%
  • Worst per-script plot match100%

Strategies — trade timing

261 / 259

strategies clearing the ≥99% entry and exit timing threshold

  • Trade references available259 / 272
  • Entry+exit timing >=99%261 / 259
  • Fully verified strategy outputs261 / 272
  • Trades compared in total214,868
  • Exact trade-count matches261 / 259
  • Net profit within tolerance259 / 259
  • Mean entry/exit timing match100% / 100%

How closely — the numbers themselves

99.669%

of the compared plotted values were the identical IEEE-754 double

  • Plotted values compared67,701,224
  • Identical to the bit67,477,563 (99.669%)
  • Scripts bit-exact throughout465 / 484
  • Explained by libm last bits3 / 484
  • Rest, within the published band16 / 484
  • Worst relative gap from TradingView1.2 × 10⁻¹⁰ (~9 sig. figures)

Methodology

Reproducible by design. The manifest pins the exact source of every script with a SHA-256 hash — and TradingView keeps every published version forever, so anyone can re-run the comparison.

run parameters 
symbol      = BINANCE:BTCUSDTtimeframe   = 30 minexceptions  = 23 scripts on their own marketbars        = 25,000+ per scriptulp_limit   = 64 (libm tier)rel_tol     = 1e-9scale_floor = 1e-9 x series mediannet_tol     = 2.0% of the larger netreference   = TradingView exportsources     = SHA-256 pinned manifest
1

Open-source scripts only

A script enters the corpus only if it is published open source, written in a supported Pine version, and its header does not forbid reuse. The detected license is recorded in the manifest.

2

No source redistribution

Only the manifest (name, author, link, license, version, SHA-256) is published. Pine sources are fetched locally, used for measurement, never re-hosted.

3

TradingView is the reference

Reference plots and trade lists come from running the original script on TradingView itself, on the same symbol, timeframe and bar range.

4

Failures stay on the board

Scripts that time out or hit harness limits are reported as-is. A proof you can't falsify is not a proof.

“Matches” is a weak word. Here is what it means.

A percentage only says the outputs landed inside a band, and a band is something we chose. So each compared value is also placed on the one scale that is not ours to choose — the IEEE-754 double both engines store it in. Consecutive representable doubles are one step apart; that step is the finest distinction the type can make.

  • bit-exact Every compared bar produced the identical double. Not “close enough”: the same 64 bits, from the first bar to the last.
  • libm The values differ only in the last bits of the mantissa, and the script reaches a transcendental function — log, exp, pow, the trig family. IEEE-754 requires + − × ÷ and sqrt to be correctly rounded, and requires nothing of those, so CPython's C library and TradingView's Java runtime can both be right and still land a few representable values apart — which a long accumulation then carries forward. The tier is capped at 64 representable values, chosen from measurement: across our own reference corpus the widest such gap is 23. A script whose numbers sit inside that cap but reaches no transcendental is not labelled this way; an explanation has to explain something.

The two tiers sit under the Verified badge in the table, because that is what they are: the rung a verified script reached, never a verdict of their own. Anything else carries no tier line — it agreed within the published band, which is what the Verified badge above already says. The band itself is one number, not two — a relative tolerance. Near zero a relative test has nothing to be relative to, so it falls back on a floor taken from the series' own median magnitude; a fixed absolute floor would be unreachable for a series living at 100,000 and larger than the whole signal for one living at 0.000001.

The band itself, script by script

Agreement “within the band” is a range, not a verdict, so here is the whole tier — worst relative gap first. The worst case is one number; the shape underneath it — a single outlier over a floor of near-exact agreement — is what a bare worst-case or a mean would throw away.

scriptmax_relsig. figures
Machine Learning Moving Average [LuxAlgo]1.2 × 10⁻¹⁰~9
Easy System 4201.0 × 10⁻¹¹~10
EMA Slope - RSI Oscillator Strategy7.5 × 10⁻¹²~11
OBV MACD Indicator5.2 × 10⁻¹²~11
TSI CCI Hull with profit$$$2.8 × 10⁻¹²~11
the other 11 scripts< 10⁻¹²12+

Don't take our word for it. Every script is pinned by SHA-256, and TradingView keeps every published version. Pull the same script, run it on your own TradingView subscription, and compare it with PyneSys. The numbers are the numbers.

The Corpus

The most-liked open-source Pine scripts on TradingView, in order of community popularity (or whatever you sort the table by — the choice is remembered). Every name links to the original publication.

Target Trend [BigBeluga]by BigBeluga · CC 10,853INDv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%11 plots
—
—28,536
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared11
  • Plotted values compared172,550
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotTitle (open)

Run

  • Bars executed28,536
  • Run time4.83 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.17 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-18 11:30
  • Bars28,536

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseCC

SHA-2564298fcdbdf33a378943a982b4968f66a392f26dbcb840154536443508470b9b8

View on TradingView
Trendline Breakout Navigator [LuxAlgo]by LuxAlgo · CC 10,846INDv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%4 plots
—
—28,537
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared4
  • Plotted values compared113,556
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotPlot

Run

  • Bars executed28,537
  • Run time5.89 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.21 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-18 12:00
  • Bars28,537

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseCC

SHA-256a6d1bf91aabecff3098a062d704fb319e398190835d75cb3e8dd638034170107

View on TradingView
Support Resistance MTFby LonesomeTheBlue · MPL-2.0 10,769INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%4 plots
—
—28,536
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared4
  • Plotted values compared114,104
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotPlot

Run

  • Bars executed28,536
  • Run time2.11 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.07 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-18 11:30
  • Bars28,536

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv4
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-256744598e3164a52c655f9863a9d53e128fe9c01a156f73b1da4b15523f8474465

View on TradingView
Boom Hunter Proby veryfid · CC 10,750INDv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%21 plots
—
—28,536
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared21
  • Plotted values compared433,891
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Transcendentals on the pathasin, cos, exp, sin
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotQuotient 1

Run

  • Bars executed28,536
  • Run time4.39 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.15 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-18 11:30
  • Bars28,536

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv6
  • LicenseCC

SHA-256b1fb13e3c677cb9109f94570bdb1763ea5c5e149f674eafcfa29eec9946fa9a5

View on TradingView
Trading ABCby LonesomeTheBlue · MPL-2.0 10,666INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%6 plots
—
—28,536
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared6
  • Plotted values compared133,686
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotPlot

Run

  • Bars executed28,536
  • Run time2.71 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.09 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-18 11:30
  • Bars28,536

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv2
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-2568ceb5cb91ad1f6640651f1ceda652f14dd52820bc0b65faa86b7ccc788c27c9e

View on TradingView
SuperBollingerTrend (Expo)by Zeiierman · CC 10,633INDv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%1 plot
—
—28,583
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared1
  • Plotted values compared28,583
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotSuperBollingerTrend

Run

  • Bars executed28,583
  • Run time2.06 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.07 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-19 11:00
  • Bars28,583

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseCC

SHA-256ed7047d12ba8e4031f315d693f0e1b151bef8841ef7e2bdec7455010c7b86121

View on TradingView
RSI Swing Indicator v2by MrDinasty · MPL-2.0 10,617INDv4Runs
—
—
—28,584

Accuracy

  • Reference outputno comparable plots exported

Run

  • Bars executed28,584
  • Run time0.48 s CPU

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-19 11:30
  • Bars28,584

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-25688347bff148253f27506f2004b3ea253f0f3c767e26d80da856dd9484ff39a86

View on TradingView
Leledc levels (IS) by InSilico 10,478INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%4 plots
—
—28,583
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared4
  • Plotted values compared57,333
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotUp

Run

  • Bars executed28,583
  • Run time1.43 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.05 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-19 11:00
  • Bars28,583

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv4
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-256db31225b6d175d61afe84bf1a934e94141dfd02cbe33f7360dd7e37aca4caea8

View on TradingView
SuperTrend + Relative Volume (Kernel Optimized)by fluxchart · MPL-2.0 10,470INDv6Verifiedbit-exact
100%5 plots
—
—27,615
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared5
  • Plotted values compared55,880
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Transcendentals on the pathasin, exp, log, pow
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotUp direction

Run

  • Bars executed27,615
  • Run time7.20 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.26 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-07-30 07:00
  • Bars27,615

Source

  • Pine versionv6
  • Script revisionv10
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-256127a082464864496b4e82dcab0f0bef7bdfc668cea8f0d8ca26296d0b5209d2c

View on TradingView
VuManChu Cipher Aby vumanchu 10,447INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%17 plots
—
—28,583
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared17
  • Plotted values compared485,640
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotEMA 1

Run

  • Bars executed28,583
  • Run time3.19 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.11 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-19 11:00
  • Bars28,583

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-256160c6bdfd4d07dc1868e98b47fbcc41704c46bad2d0209463d83aa3df66c9f72

View on TradingView
Trend Signals with TP & SL [UAlgo]by UAlgo 10,435INDv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%7 plots
—
—28,583
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared7
  • Plotted values compared88,261
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotPlot

Run

  • Bars executed28,583
  • Run time4.59 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.16 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-19 11:00
  • Bars28,583

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-256f8bde7d7fdac812b6d7564394856a61940e48ad7d525d45e480e3cc209e3898b

View on TradingView
RMI Trend Sniperby TZack88 · MPL-2.0 10,434INDv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%10 plots
—
—28,684
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared10
  • Plotted values compared286,546
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotCandles (open)

Run

  • Bars executed28,684
  • Run time1.61 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.06 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-21 13:30
  • Bars28,684

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv6
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-256f5f8bf8729c02ff2576b4eb9092d30071f53f0f19bc52b231c66e9c02cdebadc

View on TradingView
Ichimoku + Daily-Candle_X + HULL-MA_X + MacDby SeaSide420 · MPL-2.0 10,365STRv4Verified
—
100%190 / 190
✓100.000%27,846

Accuracy

  • Trades compared190 TV / 190 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)-8,571 / -8,571

Run

  • Bars executed27,846
  • Secondary-feed bars3,275
  • Total bars processed31,121
  • Run time5.10 s CPU

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-04 02:30
  • Bars27,846
  • Security @ D min3,275 bars

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv2
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-2567cbeb01ebbae6697193c8561c50a8f858fbaa46d3fc4732a562d247586fe7da4

View on TradingView
Swing Profile [BigBeluga]by BigBeluga · CC 10,270INDv6Runs
—
—
—27,615

Accuracy

  • Reference outputno comparable plots exported

Run

  • Bars executed27,615
  • Run time0.77 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.38 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-07-30 07:00
  • Bars27,615

Source

  • Pine versionv6
  • Script revisionv2
  • LicenseCC

SHA-2569cfba1062312223a0d52b7cb52996dfbb4298d37ed08cb5f8a03ee13635bdc65

View on TradingView
PMax on RSI with Tillson T3by KivancOzbilgic · MPL-2.0 10,224INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%6 plots
—
—28,684
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared6
  • Plotted values compared114,957
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotRSI

Run

  • Bars executed28,684
  • Run time2.13 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.07 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-21 13:30
  • Bars28,684

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-2560f322576606b4db21d4e70c2f63285fc5cff84f9b08b614862ae7adc4b0264dc

View on TradingView
FREE INDICATOR: Laguerre RSIby TheLark 10,221INDv4Verified
100%1 plot
—
—28,684
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared1
  • Plotted values compared28,684
  • Identical to the bit98.689%
  • Worst gap3.0 × 10⁻¹⁴ relative (~13 significant figures)
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotPlot

Run

  • Bars executed28,684
  • Run time0.90 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.03 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-21 13:30
  • Bars28,684

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv2
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-2561a77affed2aeb75958368df7e7711f6a58690749281b179ea2af3f88cf3b3264

View on TradingView
Buy Sell Signalby kelfry98 10,174INDv6Verifiedbit-exact
100%8 plots
—
—27,614
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared8
  • Plotted values compared220,896
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotFast EMA

Run

  • Bars executed27,614
  • Run time1.30 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.05 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-07-30 06:30
  • Bars27,614

Source

  • Pine versionv6
  • Script revisionv4
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-256fa0109bdbab422253cc908c4c17cb09ed1751808cefb88addbc931b0233a9a34

View on TradingView
Predictive Ranges [LuxAlgo]by LuxAlgo · CC 10,102INDv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%5 plots
—
—28,684
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared5
  • Plotted values compared143,420
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotPR Upper 2

Run

  • Bars executed28,684
  • Run time1.39 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.05 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-21 13:30
  • Bars28,684

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseCC

SHA-256e831d83de0940135e8a2cc830f005909e1826ce22f64713396f6133097430859

View on TradingView
Trend Magicby KivancOzbilgic · MPL-2.0 10,080INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%1 plot
—
—28,684
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared1
  • Plotted values compared28,679
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotPlot

Run

  • Bars executed28,684
  • Run time1.02 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.04 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-21 13:30
  • Bars28,684

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-25657f52bd45ded4b639c73affde158a1afce4b4e222ae4ac8342a2a80ba009d521

View on TradingView
RSI Divergence Indicator strategyby eemani123 10,020STRv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%9 plots
100%278 / 278
✓100.000%28,028
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared278 TV / 278 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)86,091 / 86,091
  • Plots compared9
  • Plotted values compared47,130
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotRSI

Run

  • Bars executed28,028
  • Run time2.52 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.09 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-07 21:30
  • Bars28,028

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv7
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-256f0903223f1739ef8967835fc78285fd56543ba376f7b856e35d36c165934f03d

View on TradingView
IDEAL BB with MA (With Alerts)by rautadarsh123 · MPL-2.0 10,012INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%9 plots
—
—28,729
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared9
  • Plotted values compared204,655
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotNMA Black Line

Run

  • Bars executed28,729
  • Run time2.22 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.08 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-22 12:00
  • Bars28,729

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv4
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-256608e7b339192bb822a8cbbfff74736ea8d5b3889ddd6dfccf44326b62448420a

View on TradingView
Nick Rypock Trailing Reverse (NRTR)by everget · GPL 9,991INDv6Verifiedbit-exact
100%7 plots
—
—27,614
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared7
  • Plotted values compared56,086
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotLong Stop

Run

  • Bars executed27,614
  • Run time0.76 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.03 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-07-30 06:30
  • Bars27,614

Source

  • Pine versionv6
  • Script revisionv2
  • LicenseGPL

SHA-2562663e8d20df8e24f197107d465cc57b918d76733889d781d585b17470888dd6d

View on TradingView
Market Structure with Inducements & Sweeps [LuxAlgo]by LuxAlgo · CC 9,950INDv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%2 plots
—
—28,729
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared2
  • Plotted values compared455
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotSwing High

Run

  • Bars executed28,729
  • Run time1.07 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.04 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-22 12:00
  • Bars28,729

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv2
  • LicenseCC

SHA-25634ceedaf79d6974a78e2ce14905b21cc0806a6ab24d993883cb436fc845588ca

View on TradingView
[SK] Fibonacci Auto Trend Scouterby sirkriz · MPL-2.0 9,823INDv4Lookahead
4.87%3 plots
—
—28,729
Plot match vs TradingView4.9%

Higher-timeframe lookahead — TradingView's own output leads this run by undefined bars, about one full period of the timeframe its request.security call asks for; realigned to that lead the two match —. The shape is TradingView reading a bar that had not closed yet — but a lag on the PyneCore side leaves the identical trace, and the shift alone does not separate the two, so this entry is held apart from the accuracy score and treated as open.

Accuracy

  • Plots compared3
  • Plotted values compared85,755
  • Identical to the bit4.871%
  • Worst gap1.9 × 10⁻² relative (~1 significant figures)
  • Pearson correlation (min)0.999928
  • Worst-matching plotHTF 1 1

Run

  • Bars executed28,729
  • Secondary-feed bars3,293
  • Total bars processed32,022
  • Run time134.23 s CPU
  • Per-bar time4.67 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-22 12:00
  • Bars28,729
  • Security @ 1D min3,293 bars

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv5
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-2568868959c30a4b2ef9aac9ac0290486f91acbef914e49e944276d0749ea092b9f

View on TradingView
Relative Strength Index - Divergences - Libertusby Libertus 9,805INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%1 plot
—
—28,729
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared1
  • Plotted values compared28,715
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotPlot

Run

  • Bars executed28,729
  • Run time1.09 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.04 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-22 12:00
  • Bars28,729

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv10
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-2568c4cd2e2969aec5fc4299925aedc2054b1767db9506dc6047e0971d28844f5f6

View on TradingView

Every script on this page was compiled by PyneComp and run by PyneCore. Both are live.

Try PyneComp Convert your first Pine script at pynesys.io